What is happening at the stock exchange?

Question by bb: What is happening at the stock exchange?
1 – what has actually caused the problem?
2 – why can’t it be solved?
3 – why is it so serious that I should worry as a little person in Sweden?
4 – Why are the investment banks so scared to continue as usual?

Best answer:

Answer by what?
1 – people who are too lazy to get off their ass and get a job that will let them pay their mortgage
2 – who says it can’t be solved?
3 – because the guy in sweeden probably has some money invested somewhere
4 – they aren’t. if not for mark to market, no investment bank would have gone under.

What do you think? Answer below!

What does this mean in plain English?

Question by sweetnsassy: What does this mean in plain English?
“Owing to a form of financial engineering called securitization, many mortgage lenders had passed the rights to the mortgage payments and related credit/default risk to third-party investors via mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and collateralized debt obligations (CDO). Corporate, individual and institutional investors holding MBS or CDO faced significant losses, as the value of the underlying mortgage assets declined. Stock markets in many countries declined significantly.”

Best answer:

Answer by bud68
It means mortgage lenders made reckless loans to unqualified buyers, packaged the loans into complex bond-like securities and peddled them to investors as “investment-grade” securities. These securities have now tanked.

Add your own answer in the comments!

Q&A: Board of Management Titles for an LLC?

Question by Michelle S: Board of Management Titles for an LLC?
Could someone give me an list of titles for a LLC? My sister and I both own it equally, so I assume we are Co-Chairman. So what are the titles that come after that? I was told that the titles are different from Board of Directors titles.
Does anybody know where I can find info on this?

Best answer:

What do you think? Answer below!

Explain securitization and how it relates to the global financial crisis?

Question by Adam G: Explain securitization and how it relates to the global financial crisis?

Best answer:

Answer by gorilla
When an organisation lends money it makes a legal charge on an asset ie the house for a mortgage. This is of value as the house could be sold and the bank receives interest payments relating to the debt. Over a period of time there could be thousands of such debts and the organisation may decide to sell a “parcel” of these to raise capital for other things or to improve the liquidity in its balance sheet. This is called securitization.

The global problems arose when some US companies lent money for houses to people without the ability to continue mortgage payments (it was called trailerpark lending) on the promise that the mortgage could be renewed at favourable interest rates (less than rent) and falsely inflated the values of the properties thus increasing the debt of the customer. They then securitized the lending but the value was much less than they claimed and when the property values fell, people defaulted as the debt was more than the value of their property and the banks who had purchased the parcels in good faith found that they were sat on useless paper( assets were much less than the expected value). This reduced the value of their balance sheets and also reduced their liquidity which led to distrust in the financial community as no-one knew which bank was sat on reduced value assets. The lending lines between banks were based on good faith but these were cancelled as no bank wanted to be pulled under due to the failure of another. This created a situation where credit disappeared from the system so the banks could not lend to their own customers.

It gets a bit more involved but I hope that answers your question.

Add your own answer in the comments!

Q&A: Can someone explain in layman’s terms, what securitization of mortgages is/means?

Question by ee: Can someone explain in layman’s terms, what securitization of mortgages is/means?
From what I’ve read banks supposedly ‘pooled’ their mortgages and loans and sold them to others at a profit. I don’t understand why others would pay them at a rate where they make a profit. I don’t understand why ‘pooling’ mortgages results in a value that results in a profit being made when it is sold. Why not just keep them, why sell them in the first pladce?
Any help would be really appreciated, if not answers then even links to other websites.

Best answer:

Answer by Ju
Sorry i know little about mortgages ,nothing to help you,very sorry.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Nice Finance photos

Check out these Finance images:

Finance – Financial injection – Finance
Finance
Image by @Doug88888
Finance – Financial injection – Finance

Finance
Finance
Image by Tax Credits
Finance

Finance and Commerce – New Applications Leverage The Popularity Of Social Networks – 02/16/09
Finance
Image by DavidErickson
Read: New applications leverage the popularity of social networks – Finance and Commerce.

“A lot of the gold in social media is in the analytics in giving people insight into how people behave on these social networks and finding trends within that data,” said David Erickson, director of e-Strategy at public relations and marketing firm Tunheim Partners in Minneapolis.

Q&A: What is securitization of sovereign debt in context of euro crisis ?

Question by sid: What is securitization of sovereign debt in context of euro crisis ?
Please explain in lehmann s language 🙂

Best answer:

Answer by Calliso
Means they don’t have enough money and are trying to blind side normal people with slang, then they call it a educated, learn diferent terms so no one else knows what the —-your talking about so massive cover up operations can be initiated in tronsdental alighnment with the human race!!!! ok did you get that.

Add your own answer in the comments!

When and how did the Clinton administration allow for the securitization of subprime mortgages?

Question by ortisthetortoise: When and how did the Clinton administration allow for the securitization of subprime mortgages?
Please cite sources (specific legislation, executive order, etc. – not just “CRA changes in 1995”)
I can’t seem to find these “CRA changes of 1995” in any law or order. Trying to figure out if they are fact or folklore
….changes specific to subprime securitization that is…

Best answer:

Answer by rhsaunders
It didn’t; securitization has been legal from the beginning. Which did not mean that it was smart, or that there were mechanisms in place to appropriately value such securities.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Can someone recommend a good book that thoroughly describes financial terms/concepts (for investing)?

Question by Mister Chartreuse: Can someone recommend a good book that thoroughly describes financial terms/concepts (for investing)?
An introductory book, which describes terms/concepts like securitization, derivatives, bond-markets etc.

I want to understand these things to the end of knowing how to interpret/read company balance sheets, market speculation/volatility, currency markets etc, so that I can have some general financial/investment wherewithal.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Best answer:

Answer by cactusgene
‘Investing for Dummies’ is a good book for a novice and it is available on Amazon. The advanced concepts you mention above are quite complex, but try the links below:

http://www.amazon.com/Investing-For-Dummies-Eric-Tyson/dp/047090545X
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortgage-backed_security
http://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap63e.pdf

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Can someone please explain what synthethic CDO’s are?

Question by Alex G: Can someone please explain what synthethic CDO’s are?
It’s for my project on the Great Recession. I understand the tranches & securitization process behind regular CDO’s so you don’t have to start at the beginning. Thanks so much

Best answer:

Answer by Mike
Synthetic CDOs are just side bets on mortgages. Typically they have a similar structure as regular CDO except the “senior” tranche is called the “super senior” tranche”. Typically a synthetic CDO is comprised of mortgages from other CDOs. Sometimes the synthetic CDOs are packaged with only the lower tranches of another CDO which then may be known as “CDO squared”.

Typically a synthetic CDO is protected by “credit default swaps” but seldom is the “super senior” tranche protected. It was assumed that since the “super senior” tranche was rated AAA, that tranche would not default but with all the manipulation, it was guaranteed to default.

Most of the problems during the credit crisis were caused by the synthetic CDOs and not the regular CDOs. The “super senior” tranches were the ones that were selling for 20 cents on the dollar (if they could find buyers).

http://www.tavakolistructuredfinance.com/ifr2.html
http://clickbroker.blogspot.com/2008/04/super-seniors-take-control-of-cdos.html
http://www.math.utexas.edu/users/zariphop/pdfs/ProtterTheFinancialMeltdown.pdf
http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/market-movers/2008/12/01/whats-a-super-senior-tranche?tid=true
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/merrills-reckless-mortgage-bond-binge.html
http://www.roubini.com/financemarkets-monitor/253166/is_merrill___s_cdo_transaction_with_lone_star_consistent_with_markit_abx_pricing_

What do you think? Answer below!

Incorporate to buy a multifamily property?

Question by lithium630: Incorporate to buy a multifamily property?
Is it true you should put each multifamily (4 family or less) under a different corporation?

Best answer:

Answer by teenriodoll
YES!!!! YES!!! YES!!! YES!!! YES!!!

Unless this is a quick flip for profit and even then I would put the property in the name of an LLC=Limited liability Corporation or a limited parntership. The reason is simple. Taxes and liability. Once you are in the chain of title you CAN be sued, even after you sell the property. But if the owner was a throwaway LLC then you are less likely to be sued.

Example, I was looking to purchase a property years ago. Did a title search and found the second deed of trust on the house had this long disclaimer about EPA and environmental. I did some research and found that if the property had a EPA cleanup problem, nothing prevents the U.S. Government from collecting from a former owner ever!!! Even filing bankruptcy does not wipe out an EPA claim.

Also, i bought a house with a partner who did not want to spend the money to form a LLC. I insisted or no deal. We put in LLC and two things happened. One the property had the plastic PVC piping problem that our buyer wanted us to replace all the pipes in a single family home that we were selling for $ 200,000. The cost $ 40,000. We said no. The eventual purchaser asked for and we agreed to a radon test. Well the property HAD RADON!!! Luckily we found an expert paid $ 800.00 and remidated the problem. I kept the LLC did 3 more deals in it and closed the company. I am not personally liable on this property and since the LLC has no assets there is not a likelihood of suit ever in the future. If we were in the chain of title individually, we would could be liable in the future from a future buyer. DONT BUY WITHOUT protecting yourself. You will sooner or later get sued. It is better to have in LLC or LLP then your own name. Enough said on liabilty issues.

Next, let’s talk about tax advantages. In many states you can have a one person LLC. Or be creative. another business or a family member or friend can be members in the Limited Liability Corporation. You can write off more and also maintain control by doing it this way. You do not have to report on Schedule-E instead you get a K-1 and the IRS has said that they audit K-1 less than filers with entries on Schedule-E.

So do it right. THis multi family could be lucrative for you. Set it up right.

Thanks and good luck with your investing.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Some questions regarding basic terminology in finance?

Question by Son of a B1tch: Some questions regarding basic terminology in finance?
1) Credit
2) Credit expansion
3) “Pooling” as in pooling debt.
4) Securitization

What do these mean?

Best answer:

Answer by Sean Roberts
1) Credit is providing someone with goods or services with the understanding that they will pay you in a preagreed time in the future.

2) Credit expansion is an economic term. It means the part of any increase in the money supply which is not due to a balance-of-payments surplus. The money supply can increase through a balance-of-payments surplus, on either current or capital account.

3) Debt pooling is an arrangement by which a debtor would deposit funds for the purpose of distributing such funds among his creditors. It is used in bankrupcy.

4) Securitization is the financial practice of pooling various types of contractual debt such as residential mortgages, commercial mortgages, auto loans or credit card debt obligations and selling said debt as bonds, pass-through securities, or Collateralized mortgage obligation (CMOs), to various investors. This is one of the things that led to the horrible recession we’ve gone through.

Give your answer to this question below!

Is bachelor degree in supply chain management at ashford university worth it?

Question by Choupasta: Is bachelor degree in supply chain management at ashford university worth it?
Just need some suggestions and reviews..tried to look for reviews online for this, but have not find any..and also needs to know how many classes do you need to take with ashford online to be full time student with one(3 credits) on ground class.

Best answer:

Answer by Betsy
Ashford is a for-profit school and such schools should be avoided. Although it is regionally accredited, the accreditation may have come with the school when the school was purchased from the Sisters of St. Francis. The regional accrediting agencies are changing their policies allowing companies to get accreditation when they purchase campuses from other schools, skipping the accreditation process.

Below is a link to the Wikipedia article on Ashford. Be sure to read the section title “U.S. Department of Education Audit.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashford_University

You might also want to google “Ashford University scam,” and read some of the material you find.

Almost every state has at least one public college offering a bachelor’s degree in this area. I’d suggest that you find one in your state. You can get a better education there. You will also end up paying less. Your tuition and living expenses combined will probably be less than tuition alone at Ashford. If you really must take online courses, then talk with the public college about courses they might be offering online.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Q&A: Was the securitization of subprime loans the greatest scam in history?

Question by Kuntree: Was the securitization of subprime loans the greatest scam in history?
If not what was the greatest scam?

Best answer:

Answer by wg0z
maybe. the private loans thing was many people, and the final figures
are not yet tallied.
Bernie Madoff gets my vote for now.

Add your own answer in the comments!

Securitization: Why do banks make losses then?

Question by kehoejck: Securitization: Why do banks make losses then?
“As unemployment rose during the Depression, many homeowners could not make their balloon payments, causing a wave of sales and foreclosures. The federal government stepped in, creating the Federal Housing Administration (Fannie Mae) to insure long-term mortgages, and the Home Owners Loan Corporation to sell government-guaranteed bonds to purchase non-performing mortgages. This was the beginning of the securitization that is a central feature of today’s mortgage market; lending risk is passed on to investors in mortgage-backed bonds rather than being held in the institution that originates the loans.”

So how much exactly as a rough % do banks sell as Mortgage Backed Securities and if the risk is being passed on to investors why exactly are the banks racking up such huge losses? Any help is greatly appreciated.

Best answer:

Answer by Thinker
It varies. You’d have to look at the financial statements from a given bank to determine how much they sell and how much they keep.

For example, Washington Mutual, which is in BIG trouble financially, had a habit of making loans that other lenders would be afraid to make. As a result, they were able to charge a somewhat higher rate of interest than if they were making better quality loans. But when the loans went bad, they got hurt.

Best of success.

What do you think? Answer below!

Is securitization student loans make it easier or harder for students to get a loan?

issue by : Is securitization student loans make it easier or harder for students to get a loan
Is it easier or harder for students to get a loan? How so? Achelios Well, thank you for your answer, but this is true for all loans everywhere. I’m talking about specific securitization. I think I understand the answer anyway. Securitization by private companies that allows them to pay student loans, providing more opportunities for students looking to borrow a loan. I’ll leave the question if someone has a better answer. I was not sure if the pooling loans and selling shares to investors affect interest or not Best response rates:.

response Achelios
once you start paying for the loan, then you make history paiementSi you pay on time and as agreed … then it will help you build créditToutefois, if the amount of student loan (s) is not severely limited, then it can still affect your ability to lend because of debt-revenuune once you get the balance ratio will be paid to a small amount, and if always paid on time and at least the full monthly payment under … then it can be

useful
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Should lenders who use abusive or unfair lending practices be punished?

Question by missnewjerzee: Should lenders who use abusive or unfair lending practices be punished?
these are just some examples
Failure to disclose loan price is negotiable
Failure to clearly and accurately disclose terms and conditions
Servicing agent and securitization abuses (The servicing agent is the entity that receives the mortgage payment, keeps the payment records, provides borrowers with account statements, imposes late charges when the payment is late, and pursues delinquent borrowers. A securitization is a financial transaction in which assets, especially debt instruments, are pooled and securities representing interests in the pool are issued)

now it is our responsiblity to read everything on the loan document do you think the lenders should be punished for the way they do business?
oh I agree now isn’t the time, I just mean in general
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predatory_lending

Best answer:

Answer by Ben
Yes.

What do you think? Answer below!

What is the private-label securitization market ?

Question by nomethinks: What is the private-label securitization market ?
I have the idea that it is where private investors hold bonds backed by subprime mortgages (in the past, now); I want to know, what is the expanse of the private label sec market? That is to say, what other assets and such can be included in this beyond subprime loans (if any)?

Thanks in advance- I really appreciate all the people who devote time to educate others on Yahoo! Answers.

Best answer:

Answer by jwishz
Secretary Henry M. Paulson, Jr.
Statement on Covered Bond Best Practices

Washington – Good afternoon. Thank you all for coming today. Joining me on stage are FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair, Federal Reserve Governor Kevin Warsh, OCC Comptroller John Dugan and OTS Director John Reich. We also welcome representatives from Bank of America, Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase, and Wells Fargo. I will make a few remarks, my colleagues will also address you and then Jeff Brown with Bank of America will speak.

As we are all aware, the availability of affordable mortgage financing is essential to turning the corner on the current housing correction. And so we have been looking broadly for ways to increase the availability and lower the cost of mortgage financing to accelerate the return of normal home buying and refinancing activity.

The housing government-sponsored enterprises, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Banks, and the Federal Housing Administration are funding more than 70 percent of residential mortgages during these months of market stress. They must continue to be active here.

At the same time, private-label securitization, another important source of mortgage finance, has become severely strained and credit conditions have tightened. In addition to securitization done by housing GSEs, private mortgage-backed securitization benefits the American consumer and our markets. The private-label market will evolve in response to current challenges, and I expect it to return with greater risk-awareness and investor discipline. We also believe it is useful to explore additional mortgage financing options to complement more traditional funding models.

One option we have looked at extensively is covered bonds, which are a $ 3 trillion market used widely in Europe for mortgage funding. I believe covered bonds have the potential to increase mortgage financing, improve underwriting standards, and strengthen U.S. financial institutions by providing a new funding source that will diversify their overall portfolio.

Treasury has been working with our regulatory counterparts to look at ways to support the emergence of the covered bond market in the United States. We consulted with our European counterparts, including the UK Treasury. We also spoke with potential U.S. market participants, including issuers, investors, underwriters and ratings agencies. While many European countries have dedicated covered bond legislation, the U.S. regulatory environment is different. Covered bonds are a promising financing vehicle and we believe this market can grow in the United States absent federal legislative action.

To help achieve our goal of broader choices in mortgage finance, today Treasury is publishing a Best Practices guide for U.S. residential covered bonds. This document is intended to outline practices that will promote covered bond market simplicity and homogeneity, using high quality mortgages as collateral. It is a starting point and complements the FDIC final policy statement of July 15th.

I appreciate the FDIC’s strong leadership in advocating covered bonds and providing clarity to potential investors. Together, the FDIC final policy statement and a Treasury Best Practices guide should give market participants the tools to build a market that will benefit U.S. families and the U.S. economy. A U.S. covered bond market also will present new opportunities for further international investment in the United States.

We knew that this initiative would be successful only if the largest banks paved the way. And so I welcome the announcement by America’s four largest banks, Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo, that they intend to establish covered bond programs and kick-start this market in the United States. And, I am also pleased to know that the two existing domestic issuers of covered bonds intend to align their programs with these new practices.

We applaud these banks for their leadership and for recognizing an opportunity to help increase mortgage funding availability and strengthen our financial system. We are at the early stages of what should be a promising path, where the nascent U.S. covered bond market can grow and provide a new source of mortgage financing.

Covered bonds are simply one tool for mortgage financing and will not, alone, complete the housing correction. We will continue to pursue our efforts to avoid preventable foreclosures and to speed, without impeding, the necessary course of this housing correction. Thank you and now

B a c k g r o u n d
The earliest securitized transactions date back to the early
1970s and were the sales of pooled mortgage loans by the
Government National Mortgage Association ( Ginnie Mae).
These transactions were followed by the Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) and Federal National
Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) in the early 1980s. These
new securities were backed by full faith and credit of the
respective agencies which were either government agencies
(Ginnie Mae) or quasi-government agencies (Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac). Because of such backing and guaranties, these
securities (also known as single-class mortgage pass-throughs)
carried an implied “AAA” credit rating. However, the capital
markets were looking for more technological innovations to
satisfy their investors. They were looking for diverse “maturity
” mortgage product which gave rise to the concept of
collateralized mortgage obligations (multiclass mortgage pass
throughs, CMOs or MBS) soon to be followed by asset-backed
securities (ABS). Some of these securities have managed to
become among the most exotic securities on the street.
Today, the total outstanding issuance of CMOs, MBS and ABS
has reached a staggering level of over two trillion dollars. The
non-agency or private label multiclass mortgage-backed passthrough
market originated in response to an increased
demand for low credit risk mortgage-backed securities with
diverse cashflow and maturity characteristics. The difference
between agency and private label transactions is as follows: in
the case of agency transactions, the underlying single-class
mortgage pass-through pools are government or quasigovernment
obligations and, therefore, the credit risk of such
pools is retained by these agencies and is negligible to the
investors, and in the case of private label transactions, the risk
of the underlying mortgage loans is fully transferred to the
“willing” investors as described below.
Ginnie Mae
The primary purpose of establishing Ginnie Mae was to
fund the government-sponsored residential mortgages
originated by various lenders by creating an active
secondary mortgage market. Unlike Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae does not purchase mortgages
from lenders.
The credit risk is relatively higher in the private label market
because the losses on the mortgage loans must be absorbed
directly by the investors. Unlike agency transactions, there is
no guarantee of timely or eventual payment of either principal
or interest to such investors. For investors, analysis of relative
priority of cashflows as well as the credit risk of the underlying
mortgage loans take a significant role in the private label
market.
The success of securitization in the mortgage market and the
acceptance of new securities by the investors has lent application
of this concept to other assets such as credit cards, auto
loans, leases and many others. The primary focus here is to
deal with the concept of securitization in the context of some of
the other commonly securitized assets. We will assess the
needs of financial institutions and industrial firms to apply this
technology to create a source of funding for themselves.
Fixed income or derivative?
MBS/ABS are considered “fixed-income” securities as well as
“derivative” securities. “Fixed-income” pertains to the fact that
MBS/ABS generate a coupon income (not necessarily a fixed
dollar amount) periodically whereas “derivative” refers to
MBS/ABS being “carved or derived” out of an underlying pool
of assets. Unlike other fixed income securities such as corporate
bonds, MBS/ABS are fairly complex instruments to
analyze. As mentioned above, MBS/ABS are structured to
satisfy the “risk,” “return” and “maturity” characteristics of
different investors. Imagine an upward-sloping yield curve
vertically cut out into small slices where each slice represents a
“tranche” or a “class” in an MBS/ABS. Each “tranche” has a
different priority of payment of interest and principal. This
priority of payment is what makes MBS/ABS somewhat difficult
to analyze.
All “agency” securitizations are implicitly “AAA” rated and
therefore carry negligible credit risk, whereas, the privatelabel
market has produced multiclass mortgage pass-throughs
with ratings ranging from “AAA” to below investment grade.
Basic Analysis
In view of the fact that securitization technology has grown
tremendously not only domestically but also globally calls
for a better understanding of this technology. The basic
rule of thumb to understanding this innovative process is to
stick to the “basics!” “Information overload” can prevent
people from learning and understanding the benefits and
attributes of such technology. We will study some of the
2
3
4
5
6
0 10 20 30
1
attributes from both an issuer’s and investor’s perspective. We
will approach this process in two parts. First, we will determine
why securitization may be beneficial to some issuers; and
second, why investors may want to buy these securities.
• Why securitize? Issuer’s perspective.
• Why buy? Investor’s perspective.
Why Securitize? Issuer’s perspective.
Securitization offers several benefits to an issuer. Instead of
simply listing out the benefits, let’s take a methodical
approach to finding out

Give your answer to this question below!